SRI:Barbwire Terrace Ground Gravity Survey Completed-Updated
12 September 2024
Barbwire Terrace Ground Gravity Survey Completed
Please find attached a copy of the announcement made to ASX on 9 September 2024 that has
been updated to include Appendix 1: JORC Code, 2012 Edition – Table 1.
This announcement has been authorised for release by the Managing Director of Sipa Resources
Limited.
More Information:
Investors/Corporate:
Andrew Muir, Managing Director
Sipa Resources Limited
+61 (0) 8 9388 1551
Media:
Nicholas Read
Read Corporate
+61 (0) 8 9388 1474
reception@sipa.com.au
info@readcorporate.com.au
ASX: SRI
Page 1 of 1
sipa.com.au
12 September 2024
Barbwire Terrace Ground Gravity Survey Completed
Ground gravity survey completed, enhances prospectivity
• Initial review of the ground gravity survey has highlighted a significant gravity anomaly as
well as structural complexity in a priority area at the 50% owned Barbwire Terrace Pb-ZnAg project
• Both are positive indicators, potentially indicating the right host units as well as necessary
fluid pathways for mineralisation
• Exploration is targeting Mississippi Valley style zinc-lead-silver deposits, similar to the
Lennard Shelf deposits, located on the northern side of the Fitzroy trough
• The survey received an award for EIS co-funding, with 50% of the survey costs to be
reimbursed
Drilling planned for 2025
• The survey infilled a sizeable gap in the detailed gravity data, proximal to the most
favourable hole from previous drilling, with the new data essential for enabling further drill
targeting
• The data will be incorporated into existing datasets with a view to completing a structural
interpretation
• This interpretation will be used to refine targets for diamond drilling in 2025
Sipa Resources Limited (ASX: SRI) (“Sipa” or “the Company”) is
pleased to provide an update on its Barbwire Terrace Project,
which is a 50:50 joint venture with Buru Energy Limited (ASX –
BRU).
The detailed ground gravity program at Barbwire Terrace has now
been completed. The survey infilled the south-eastern portion of
the project and has significantly improved our understanding of
the geology and location of the Fenton Fault, including an
apparent flexure or offset of the major structure. The Fenton Fault,
as well as associated splays and oblique faults, is interpreted to
represent crucial fluid pathways for lead-zinc-silver mineralisation
within the project.
ASX: SRI
Page 1 of 9
sipa.com.au
12 September 2024
Barbwire Terrace Project: regional geology and local gravity
Barbwire Terrace Project: Ground gravity crew on-site
Broad spaced diamond drilling by the Joint Venture in 2022 demonstrated proof of concept. The
drilling intersecting the Pillara Limestone, which hosts the analogue Lennard shelf deposits, with
base metal sulphides present in each hole (See ASX: 18/01/2023).
ASX: SRI
Page 2 of 9
sipa.com.au
12 September 2024
The data will now be sent for interpretation, with the results utilised to design next year’s diamond
drilling campaign, which will be more focussed than the previous broad spaced drilling.
Higher density anomaly with internal
discrete gravity response
1VD shows discrete breaks, indicating
potential structural complexity, which is
positive for fluid flow
Barbwire Terrace Project: Detailed gravity survey data - Bouguer Anomaly (top) and Bouguer
Anomaly 1st Vertical Derivative (Bottom)
ASX: SRI
Page 3 of 9
sipa.com.au
12 September 2024
Looking Forward
Following the gravity survey at Barbwire Terrace, Sipa continues to step up its field activities, with
planned work on other projects in 2024 to include:
•
Drilling at Paterson North,
•
Drilling at Skeleton Rocks, and
•
Surface exploration at Wolfe Basin.
The Company is also continuing to review the current portfolio, and is open to opportunities for
acquisitions, divestments or joint ventures.
This announcement has been authorised for release by the Board of Sipa Resources Limited.
More Information:
Investors/Corporate:
Andrew Muir, Managing Director
Sipa Resources Limited
+61 (0) 8 9388 1551
Media:
Nicholas Read
Read Corporate
+61 (0) 8 9388 1474
reception@sipa.com.au
info@readcorporate.com.au
Competent Person Statement
The information in this report that relates to Exploration Results is based on, and fairly represents,
information and supporting documentation compiled by Ms Anna Price, a Member of the
Australian Institute of Geoscientists. Ms Anna Price is a full-time employee of Sipa Resources
Limited who holds options in the Company and has sufficient experience relevant to the styles of
mineralisation and types of deposit under consideration and to the activities being undertaken to
qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for
Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. Ms Price consents to the
inclusion in this report of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which
they appear.
ASX: SRI
Page 4 of 9
sipa.com.au
12 September 2024
About Sipa
Sipa Resources Limited (ASX: SRI) is an Australian-based exploration company focused on the
discovery of precious, base and specialty metal deposits, primarily in Western Australia.
•
The Paterson Project is targeting intrusion-related copper-gold mineralisation concealed
by more recent cover sediments and is located to the northeast of Rio Tinto’s Winu coppergold discovery.
•
The Skeleton Rocks Project covers outcropping and buried greenstone units, prospective
for gold, lithium and nickel-copper-platinum group element (Ni-Cu-PGE) deposits, with
limited previous drilling completed.
•
The Barbwire Terrace base metal (lead-zinc) project, where exploration to date has
achieved ‘proof of concept’ status, involves an innovative joint venture with energy
company, Buru Energy Limited.
•
At Wolfe Basin, extensive sedex-style base metal (copper-lead-zinc) anomalism and
gossans provide targets for drill testing along a >80km long prospective horizon.
•
The Warralong Project is prospective for intrusion-related gold and lithium-tin-tantalum
mineralisation in the north Pilbara region, in an analogous, parallel structural setting to
recent discoveries such as Hemi.
ASX: SRI
Page 5 of 9
sipa.com.au
12 September 2024
Appendix 1: JORC Code, 2012 Edition – Table 1
Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data
Criteria in this section apply to all succeeding sections.
Criteria
Sampling
JORC Code explanation
•
techniques
•
•
Commentary
Nature and quality of sampling (e.g., cut channels, random •
chips, or specific specialised industry standard measurement
tools appropriate to the minerals under investigation, such as
down hole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments,
etc).
•
Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample
representivity and the appropriate calibration of any
measurement tools or systems used.
Aspects of the determination of mineralisation Material to the
Public Report.
•
Drilling
recovery
Drill type and details (e.g., core diameter, triple or standard •
tube, depth of diamond tails, face-sampling bit, or other type,
whether core is oriented and if so, by what method, etc).
No drilling was undertaken
•
Method of recording and assessing sample recoveries and •
results.
Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure
representative nature of the samples.
Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and
grade and whether sample bias may have occurred due to
preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse material.
No drilling was undertaken
Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and •
geotechnically logged to a level of detail to support
appropriate Mineral Resource estimation, mining studies and
metallurgical studies.
Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature.
The total length and percentage of the relevant intersections
logged.
No drilling was undertaken
If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all •
core taken.
If non-core, split type, and whether sampled wet or dry.
For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness
of the sample preparation technique.
Quality control procedures adopted to maximise
representivity of samples.
Measures to ensure that the sampling is representative of the
in-situ material collected, including for instance results for
field duplicate/second-half sampling.
Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the
material sampled.
No drilling was undertaken
•
•
Logging
•
•
•
Subsampling
techniques
•
•
•
and sample
preparation
•
•
•
ASX: SRI
The survey was tied to Atlas base
202408700001 which was tied to
existing base 202108200001.
•
techniques
Drill sample
Gravity data was collected by Atlas
Geophysics in August 2024 using a Scintrex
CG5 gravity meter and CHC GNSS receivers
operating in PPL mode.
The Scintrex CG5 is capable of a resolution
of 0.001 mGal (0.01gu), with data collected
at a spacing of 200m along northeastsouthwest oriented lines located 400m
apart. A total of 2,725 stations were taken
with 57 stations (3.23%) repeated for quality
control and to test for instrumental drift. The
RMS error of the gravity repeats was 0.012
mGal while the RMS error of the elevation
repeats was 0.013m.
Page 6 of 9
sipa.com.au
12 September 2024
Criteria
Quality of
JORC Code explanation
•
The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and •
laboratory procedures used and whether the technique is
considered partial or total.
For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF
instruments, etc, the parameters used in determining the
analysis including instrument make and model, reading
times, calibrations factors applied and their derivation, etc.
Nature of quality control procedures adopted (e.g.
standards, blanks, duplicates, external laboratory checks)
and whether acceptable levels of accuracy and precision
have been established.
The quality of the collected data is overall
excellent. Instrumental drift was monitored
using base station readings in the afternoon
and evening. Repeat stations totalling 57
stations or 3.23% of the collected stations
were acquired to ensure data accuracy was
preserved.
The verification of significant intersections by either •
independent or alternative company personnel.
The use of twinned holes.
Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data
verification, data storage (physical and electronic) protocols.
Discuss any adjustment to assay data.
57 station repeats were collected (approx.
3.23% of data) to ensure the accuracy of the
survey.
Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes •
(collar and down-hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and
other locations used in Mineral Resource estimation.
Specification of the grid system used.
Quality and adequacy of topographic control.
Atlas surveyed all gravity stations using the
PPK (post processed kinematic) method
using CHC base and rover GNSS receivers
which track all commercially available GNSS
signals.
•
Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results.
Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to
establish the degree of geological and grade continuity •
appropriate for the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve
estimation procedure(s) and classifications applied.
Whether sample compositing has been applied.
Survey lines were oriented northeastsouthwest at a spacing of 400m.
Data was collected along lines at a spacing
of 200m.
•
Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased •
sampling of possible structures and the extent to which this is
known, considering the deposit type.
If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the
orientation of key mineralised structures is considered to
have introduced a sampling bias, this should be assessed and
reported if material.
Survey lines were planned in order to
maximise coverage across-strike of a known
major structure, which trends in generally
northwest-southeast orientation.
•
The measures taken to ensure sample security.
•
The Atlas team collected the survey data
and each day downloaded the results from
the CG5 and uploaded them for review at
Atlas’s head office by geophysical
specialists.
Sipa was provided with regular updates on
progress of the survey via images of the
collected data (not corrected for terrain
effects) and the cumulative number of
stations collected.
Review and processing of the final data to
produce imagery was completed by
geophysics
specialists
at
Precision
Geophysics.
assay data
and
•
laboratory
tests
•
Verification
•
of sampling
•
and assaying •
•
Location of
•
data points
•
•
Data spacing •
•
and
distribution
•
Orientation
•
of data in
relation to
geological
structure
Sample
Commentary
security
•
•
Audits or
reviews
ASX: SRI
•
The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques •
and data.
Page 7 of 9
No audits were completed.
sipa.com.au
12 September 2024
Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results
Criteria in this section apply to all succeeding sections.
Criteria
JORC Code explanation
Commentary
Type, reference name/number, location and ownership •
including agreements or material issues with third parties
such as joint ventures, partnerships, overriding royalties,
native title interests, historical sites, wilderness or national
park and environmental settings.
The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting
along with any known impediments to obtaining a licence •
to operate in the area.
The results reported in this Announcement
are from granted Exploration Licences
E04/2674 and E04/2684, which is a 50:50
joint venture between Sipa Exploration NL
and Battmin Pty Ltd, a subsidiary of Buru
Energy Limited.
The tenements are in good standing, with all
necessary licences to conduct mineral
exploration obtained.
•
Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other •
parties.
Limited relevant mineral exploration activity
has previously been completed and is
restricted to broad spaced geophysical
surveys with the nearest drilling 10’s km
away.
Geology
•
Deposit type, geological setting and style of mineralisation. •
The JV partners are targeting MVT style
base metal (Pb-Zn) deposits.
Drillhole
•
A summary of all information material to the understanding •
of the exploration results including a tabulation of the
following information for all Material drill holes:
o easting and northing of the drill hole collar
o elevation or RL of the drill hole collar
o dip and azimuth of the hole
o down hole length and interception depth
o hole length.
If the exclusion of this information is justified on the basis
that the information is not Material and this exclusion does
not detract from the understanding of the report, the
Competent Person should clearly explain why this is the
case.
Not Applicable - No drilling completed
In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging •
techniques, maximum and/or minimum grade truncations
(e.g., cutting of high grades) and cut-off grades are usually
Material and should be stated.
Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of
high-grade results and longer lengths of low-grade results,
the procedure used for such aggregation should be stated
and some typical examples of such aggregations should be
shown in detail.
The assumptions used for any reporting of metal equivalent
values.
Not Applicable - No drilling completed
Mineral
•
tenement and
land tenure
status
•
Exploration by
other parties
Information
•
Data
•
aggregation
methods
•
•
ASX: SRI
Page 8 of 9
sipa.com.au
12 September 2024
Criteria
Relationship
between
mineralisation
widths and
•
•
•
intercept
lengths
JORC Code explanation
Commentary
These relationships are important in the reporting of •
Exploration Results.
If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill
hole angle is known, its nature should be reported.
If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are
reported, there should be a clear statement to this effect
(e.g. ‘down hole length, true width not known’).
Not Applicable - No drilling completed
Diagrams
•
Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and •
tabulations of intercepts should be included for any
significant discovery being reported These should include,
but not be limited to a plan view of drill hole collar locations
and appropriate sectional views.
See main body text.
Balanced
•
Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results •
is not practicable, representative reporting of both low and
high grades and/or widths should be practiced to avoid
misleading reporting of Exploration Results.
The release is considered to be balanced,
with all relevant information included in the
release.
•
Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, should •
be reported including (but not limited to): geological
observations; geophysical survey results; geochemical
survey results; bulk samples – size and method of
treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk density,
groundwater, geotechnical and rock characteristics;
potential deleterious or contaminating substances.
To the best of the Company’s knowledge,
no material exploration data or information
has been omitted from this Release.
•
The nature and scale of planned further work (e.g., tests for •
lateral extensions or depth extensions or large-scale stepout drilling).
Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible
extensions, including the main geological interpretations
and future drilling areas, provided this information is not
commercially sensitive.
Follow up work currently planned includes a
detailed review and interpretation of the
gravity results, followed by drilling.
reporting
Other
substantive
exploration
data
Further work
•
ASX: SRI
Page 9 of 9
sipa.com.au
Share your feedback
Discover